• Home
  • About Us
  • Construction Law Book
  • Construction Law Seminar 2018
  • Our Construction Lawyers
  • Contact Us

Tennessee Construction Lawyers

Construction Law Attorneys
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Construction Law Book
  • Construction Law Seminar 2018
  • Our Construction Lawyers
  • Contact Us
Menu
  • Home
  • /
  • Contract Negotiation
  • /
  • “Pay that man his money,” or don’t. Contingent Payment in Tennessee for Subcontractors
Wally Irvin
February 22, 2018

“Pay that man his money,” or don’t. Contingent Payment in Tennessee for Subcontractors

The payment term is the most important provision of any subcontract.  Subcontractors are not typically advanced money at the start of their work, requiring them to front the cost of construction based on the contractor’s contractual obligation to pay.  But, a subcontractor must insure the contractor’s payment obligation is not illusory.  Pay-if-paid and pay-when-paid provisions are frequently misunderstood.

A pay-if-paid provision shifts the risk of nonpayment from the contractor to the subcontractor.  If the contractor is not paid by the owner, the subcontractor likewise does not receive payment.  To be enforceable, the provision must unequivocally establish that payment from the owner to the contract is an express condition precedent to the contractor’s obligation to make payment to the subcontractor.  In contrast, a pay-when-paid provision deals only with timing.  The contractor must pay the subcontractor upon receipt of payment from the owner; however, if the owner fails to pay, the contractor must still pay the subcontractor within a reasonable time.  If the contractor is not paid by the owner, the contractor is still responsible for payment to the subcontractor.

Recently, the Kentucky Supreme Court clearly joined Tennessee and other states that find a pay-if-paid clause is enforceable if it establishes that payment from the owner to the contractor is an express condition precedent to the contractor’s obligation to pay the subcontractor.  See, Superior Steel v. Ascent at Roebling’s Bridge, LLC.  For more than 20 years, Tennessee has enforced pay-if-paid clauses, provided the payment condition was explicit.  See, Koch v. Construction Technology, Inc.  A minority of states, such as North Carolina, expressly reject pay-if-paid clauses and find they are unenforceable.  In most instances, these states treat the provision as a pay-when-provision, though some place strict time restrictions on the contractor in which it must pay the subcontractor.

Before entering into any subcontract, determine whether a pay-if-paid or a pay-when-paid is in the subcontract.  If present, research how the state in which the project is located treats the provision.  The American Subcontractors Association has a number of resources for contractors, including a guide to Contingent Payment Clauses in the 50 States.  If the state in which you are working permits pay-if-paid clauses, attempt to negotiate the provision out of your contract.  If that is not possible, subcontractors should try to include a provision that allows them to suspend the work until payment is made.  Contractors are in the business of making money.  Hobbies cost money.  By eliminating a pay-if-paid clause, subcontractors can make sure they are not just working for fun.

Photo: 401(K)2012

This entry was posted in Contract Negotiation, Subcontractors, Tennessee Case Law and tagged contingent payment, Contracts, Subcontractors. Bookmark the permalink.
« Government Shutdown Looming, What You Should Know
Robots in the Construction Industry: Robots and automation arrive on construction sites »

Social Media

  • Follow us on twitter
  • Follow us on facebook
  • Follow us on linkedinr
  • Follow our RSS feed

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
We take your privacy seriously. We will not share your email address.

Recent Posts

  • Tennessee Reconstructs Construction Statutes
  • Covid-19 & Construction in Tennessee: Are We Open for Business? Apparently, but . .
  • THE TIMES THEY ARE A CHANGIN’ – CONTINGENT PAYMENT AND LIENS IN TENNESSEE
  • FREE TRAINING AT SAFETYFEST TN 2019
  • LT Knoxville Construction Law Seminar 2018

Blog Contributors

Brady Cody
Brady Cody (1)
David Draper
David Draper (7)
Jason Pannu
Jason Pannu (12)
John Craig Howell
John Craig Howell (1)
Paul Whitt
Paul Whitt (14)
Preston Hawkins
Preston Hawkins
Stephen Barton
Stephen Barton (1)
Wally Irvin
Wally Irvin (23)

Topics

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration
  • Construction
  • Construction Law
  • Contract Negotiation
  • Contractors
  • Design Professionals
    • Architects
    • Engineers
  • Employment Law
  • Federal Contracting
  • Legal Issues
    • Lien Law
    • Statutes & Legislation
    • Tennessee Case Law
  • Lewis Thomason
  • Subcontractors
  • Tennessee Construction
    • Knoxville
    • Memphis
    • Nashville
  • Uncategorized

Recent Comments

  • Wally Irvin on OSHA Penalties to Increase Dramatically

Archives

  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2019
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015

healtharticl.com

© Lewis, Thomason, King, Krieg & Waldrop, P.C. 2017
www.lewisthomason.com