• Home
  • About Us
  • Construction Law Book
  • Construction Law Seminar 2018
  • Our Construction Lawyers
  • Contact Us

Tennessee Construction Lawyers

Construction Law Attorneys
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Construction Law Book
  • Construction Law Seminar 2018
  • Our Construction Lawyers
  • Contact Us
Menu
  • Home
  • /
  • Legal Issues
  • /
  • Lien Law
  • /
  • Failure to Serve Notice of Nonpayment Renders Lien Invalid
Wally Irvin
August 13, 2015

Failure to Serve Notice of Nonpayment Renders Lien Invalid

The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed Tennessee’s requirement that remote contractors (subcontractors, sub-subcontrators, material suppliers to a subcontractor, etc.) must serve notices of nonpayment on both the owner and prime contractor (the General Contractor).  In Diaz Construction v. Ind. Dev. Board of Metro. Gov’t of Nashville and Davidson County, a remote contractor appealed the trial court’s dismissal of its lien enforcement action.  Diaz, a lower-tier subcontractor, provided a notice of non-payment to the owner and the remote contractor with whom it contracted on the project.  However, Diaz failed to provide the requisite notice to the prime contractor.  Tennessee law requires remote contractors to provide notice of nonpayment to the owner and the “prime contractor in contractual privity with the remote contractor.”  Diaz contended it satisfied this requirement by serving notice on the owner and the remote contractor with whom it contracted.  The court of appeals, agreeing with the trial court, found otherwise.  The purpose of requiring notice is to allow the owner and prime contractor an opportunity to investigate and cure its subcontractors failure to pay.  Presumably, the remote contractor with whom Diaz contracted knew of its unpaid balance.  In contrast, it is not as likely the prime contractor on the project knew of the payment dispute.  The court of appeals found the phrase “prime contractor in contractual privity with the remote contractor” did not mean the entity with whom the remote contractor contracted, but the prime contractor upstream of the remote contractor.  By not providing a notice of nonpayment to the prime contractor, the remote contractor took away the prime contractor’s opportunity to remedy the delinquency.  More importantly, the failure to serve the notice of nonpayment on both the owner and the prime contractor meant the remote contractor failed to perfect its lien claim, rendering the lien invalid.  Accordingly, the court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision to dismiss the lien claim.

This entry was posted in Lien Law, Statutes & Legislation, Subcontractors, Tennessee Case Law and tagged Lien Law, Notice of Nonpayment, Subcontractors. Bookmark the permalink.
« David Garst Recipient of American Institute of Architects/Tennessee Society Presidential Award of Excellence
Sears Crosstown Project in Memphis, Tennessee »

Social Media

  • Follow us on twitter
  • Follow us on facebook
  • Follow us on linkedinr
  • Follow our RSS feed

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
We take your privacy seriously. We will not share your email address.

Recent Posts

  • Tennessee Reconstructs Construction Statutes
  • Covid-19 & Construction in Tennessee: Are We Open for Business? Apparently, but . .
  • THE TIMES THEY ARE A CHANGIN’ – CONTINGENT PAYMENT AND LIENS IN TENNESSEE
  • FREE TRAINING AT SAFETYFEST TN 2019
  • LT Knoxville Construction Law Seminar 2018

Blog Contributors

Brady Cody
Brady Cody (1)
David Draper
David Draper (7)
Jason Pannu
Jason Pannu (12)
John Craig Howell
John Craig Howell (1)
Paul Whitt
Paul Whitt (14)
Preston Hawkins
Preston Hawkins
Stephen Barton
Stephen Barton (1)
Wally Irvin
Wally Irvin (23)

Topics

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration
  • Construction
  • Construction Law
  • Contract Negotiation
  • Contractors
  • Design Professionals
    • Architects
    • Engineers
  • Employment Law
  • Federal Contracting
  • Legal Issues
    • Lien Law
    • Statutes & Legislation
    • Tennessee Case Law
  • Lewis Thomason
  • Subcontractors
  • Tennessee Construction
    • Knoxville
    • Memphis
    • Nashville
  • Uncategorized

Recent Comments

  • Wally Irvin on OSHA Penalties to Increase Dramatically

Archives

  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2019
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015

healtharticl.com

© Lewis, Thomason, King, Krieg & Waldrop, P.C. 2017
www.lewisthomason.com